Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
<span style="font-size: 13.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: " lucida="" sans="" unicode",="" sans-serif;"="">A matter of considerable controversy at present condition whether now days upgraded medical industry extending people life by curing the diseases which were not covered yet in human history. I'll explain both side of these two points in below essay.
To begin with, there are multiple examples which often increased human life through the latest medicine. A worldwide known story about a great scientist or in other words scientist of the decade i.e. Mr. Stephen Hokins, whom his doctor advise that he will be live till his 16th birthday on his 13th bday but due to advanced medical technology he lived till his 78 year life span and died, means overall 60years extended life span compare to normal one. In above scenario, we can easily give our opinion about the updated inventions which helping people to expand or extend their view in prospective of wisdom and way of the living. considering above mentioned details it can be clearly understood that the advanced medical technology is blessing for society.
On the other hand, there are multiple disadvantages also need to consider while preparing for the result i.e. lots of actual cases where people dead due to irrelevant tablets and injection due to improper medication. In linked to that, the price of prescription is higher rather than traditional methods.
In conclusion, I personally recommend that, depicting the above information the updated medication technology is blessing for humankind.</span>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , =
...s;' sans='' unicode',='' sans-serif;'='&ap...
^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
... were not covered yet in human history. Ill explain both side of these two points i...
^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'words'' or 'word's'?
Suggestion: words'; word's
...ory about a great scientist or in other words scientist of the decade i.e. Mr. Stephe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Considering
...ective of wisdom and way of the living. considering above mentioned details it can be clear...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70204081633 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.85105880171 2.71678728327 142% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697959183673 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.557224593 50.4703680194 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 155.222222222 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168517622996 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716151903504 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737662738402 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109071838687 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843340444896 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.