Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that advancements in medicine have great contribution to decrease mortality rate. I, personally think that this statement is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the fact in relation to medical advancements.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument to discuss impact of technological advancements on human health. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in this contemporary world, every developed nation is trying to indroduce latest and innovative technological procedures to cure serious health issues. As a prime example, recently America has introduced proton therapy to kill cancerous cell, which only targets the affected cell and has minimum side effects. Consequently, this procedure is quiet beneficial to advance stages of irreversible cancers.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that invention of new therapeutic drugs to manage critical diseases are highly effective and ultimately, would result in decrease mortality rates.
To recapitulate, forgoing discussion propounds that advancement in medical interventions is the responsible factor to extend human life. Thus, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the fact in relation to medical advancement...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66831683168 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07216810111 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688118811881 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3451048332 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0853881484443 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354193597486 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576930946882 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517158277816 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506975641691 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.