More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of online available information and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of internet based data is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that scientific websites can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, digital studying can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of environmental conservation, as well as financial efficiency, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the advantages of online library. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both E-books and online survey apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of Ecology, printed books might increase the consequences of deforestation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the paper use would relate to this reality that the demerits of unrecyclable materials pertain to increasing pollution. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of publication deficiency is correlated negatively with unreliable facts. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of misunderstood information.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online research far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of saving money and time prove the significance of reliable information, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81102362205 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36720754872 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681102362205 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9067825689 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110263056852 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361772569126 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429529860836 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564365624979 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224210570086 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.