Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem to have less free time.
In your opinion, has technology improved the quality of life or made it more complicated ? Support your arguments with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
Many people in developed nations have their homes filled with gadgets and work automating devices like vacuum cleaners, dishwashers and computers. Some people believe that this reduces the manual effort and contribute in saving time, while others argue that people do not have enough free time even after possessing these devices. I firmly believe that technology has improved the effectiveness of performing various day to day tasks and ultimately the quality of life.
Firstly, technological advancements have greatly improved human work efficiency. For example, devices like vacuum cleaner can clean the entire house in a fraction of minutes. Moreover, computers can perform various complicated operations with the speed of light and internet has made it possible to connect to any person around the world. In addition, with the help of mobile phones we can talk to anyone in a matter of seconds. Therefore, it is quite evident that technology has improved the living standards.
However, some people believe that despite these technological advancements we seem to have less free time. Although, this might be true to some extent, but it is quite critical to understand that people who do not get free time might not be managing their schedule in a better way. For instance, individuals keep wasting their free time on mobile phones doing nothing. Hence, it is of paramount importance to make the proper use of the tools available to us to get more free time .
To recapitulate, technology has played an instrumental role in changing the world for the better and has greatly improved the quality of life. People must make positive use of technology and manage their schedule effectively to get more free time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ls available to us to get more free time . To recapitulate, technology has pla...
^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee time . To recapitulate, technology has played an instrumental role in chang...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20143884892 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74488327501 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553956834532 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5613916953 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18253820026 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603070186982 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798021282096 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107458936233 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854799711136 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.