Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person's age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older

Essay topics:

Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person's age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal ?

People are sometimes discriminated in the workplace on the decisions of employment, promotions or dismissals on the basis of age. I firmly believe, that such discrimination is incorrect and should be made illegal.

Firstly, every citizen in a country has equal rights but these are not applicable in the workplace. The employees are not always validated on the basis of their performance and effectiveness but on their age. For example, employers dismiss individuals because of their age even when they are performing at their best. Moreover, companies do not take into account the years of hard work and devotion that the workers have given to the organization.

Secondly, companies promote individuals on the basis of their age and relations with the seniors. They completely ignore an employee's ability and skill. To illustrate, many organizations promote youngsters and want them to take the lead role leaving the older people behind. They do not understand that experience also plays an instrumental role in solving critical issues and taking the right decisions.

To recapitulate, an individual must be evaluated on the basis of performance and effectiveness rather than age. It is the responsibility of the government to make age-based discrimination illegal and empower the citizens to be able to fight for their rights in case such issues occur.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... the seniors. They completely ignore an employees ability and skill. To illustrate, many ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35348837209 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15500409481 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6566246836 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.9166666667 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268375703341 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965504493236 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809470262091 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18131582853 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106127838721 0.0609392437508 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.