music promotes learning.
In the new age of globalization, there is an ongoing debate about the music whether it stimulate the learning power among teenagers or not. Myriad people believe that it is beneficial for adolescents. However, others decline this notion. I will provide several reasons from both sides thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
On the outset, music is food for soul as it aids to eradicate the issue of stress, to cite an epitome, every person used to listen to music because it gives them relief from daily life tensions. Consequently, it refreshes people’s mind, and improves the mental capabilities. Most importantly, numerous aspirants take part in music performances in school which could not only build self-confident but also contribute in the future opportunities. In addition, music enhances the grasping power of juveniles.
On the flip side, people who think that music has negative effect on learners because they believe that listening to music could distract scholars from their goals in life. Secondly, ample children play music instruments for long time and, never concentrate at major subjects. Therefore, they acquire low grades in academics, which would have drastic effects in the future.
To recapitulate, it is proven that music fruitful to enhance the mental abilities of juveniles. However, there is no dearth of its demerits. Therefore, parents should limit the time to music for children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34821428571 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90885128811 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678571428571 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3275389443 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5714285714 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19657724766 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628065831586 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057330775988 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121452497338 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411814565194 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.