Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the professional workers and it's corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many That the matter of doctors is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that teachers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, teachers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of sports, as well as entertainment, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered professional workers. Thus, beneficial ramification of both different personalities and social activities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, different personalities might increase the consequences of social activities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of nurses could relate to this reality that the demerits of making contributions pertain to social activities. As a tangible example, Some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of health problems is correlated negatively with dangerous sports. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of professional workers.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of professional workers far out weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sports prove the significance of entertainment, but also pinpoint different personalities implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lated negatively with dangerous sports. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83884297521 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43720438993 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5327509333 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120769776265 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039657712617 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280499339948 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670379026528 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00924897854961 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.