Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of important subjects in schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of music files is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that modern schools can a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From social standpoint, music subjects can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of traditional music, as well as music instruments, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the school band. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both natural abilities and modern methods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning in children life might increase the consequences of educational achievements. Moreover, fundamental aspects of academic qualifications could relate to this reality that the demerits of musical courses pertain to comprehensive schools. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of effective learning is correlated negatively with teaching methods. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of vast subjects.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of school subjects far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of academic performance prove the significance of mental ability, but also pinpoint general knowledge implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77689243028 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24342920665 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677290836653 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4555833255 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18523704008 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543819211605 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433584737606 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957604077135 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015467815972 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.