In recent years some websites have appeared which allow students to grade their teachers. Some people believe that this is a good idea, while others think that these websites give power to the wrong people.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, students are getting access to several websites which offer them to remark their tutors. It is considered by many that this is a great notion to grade thee teachers, however, some individuals believe that this facility may get misused by wrong hands. This essay will discuss the reasons why the notion of grading the teachers would be great as well as how it can get mishandle by wrong people.
There are a great number of reasons to support the belief of grading tutors. More specifically, students can remark their teachers on their weak areas on such websites. For instance, when a scholar is grading his tutor on some specific skill set then it becomes lucid for the teachers as well to work out on those feeble sections. Therefore, grading tutors by their students is indeed a effective notion to excel the tutors particular skill set.
In contrast, other individuals hold the notion that through these websites few people can make the wrong use of it. This is quite usual that at certain point of time in academic career few students do not have healthy equations with their tutors. To exemplify, such scholars can take their personal avenge by giving bad remarks to their tutors and it can destroy the career of teachers. Thus, these website in some way can really give power in wrong hand.
This essay discussed how these websites can be both good and bad for tutors. In my opinion, the benefit of remarking tutors by their students through these websites is a good idea, albeit it needs to get handle with care.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ding tutors by their students is indeed a effective notion to excel the tutors pa...
^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, such scholars can take their personal avenge by giving bad remarks to their tu...
^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this website' or 'these websites'?
Suggestion: this website; these websites
...n destroy the career of teachers. Thus, these website in some way can really give power in wr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33365096945 2.71678728327 86% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.298902565 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307929165381 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11417550294 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578316375187 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190498773896 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054855464702 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.1260098522 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.