In recent years some websites have appeared which allow students to grade their teachers. Some people believe that this is a good idea, while others think that these websites give power to the wrong people.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading
Nowadays, many websites have been published to help the students by allowing them to grade their teachers. While some people tend to believe that this will help teachers to do their self-assessment, whereas others believe that some people may misuse the grading system. This essay will discuss, why students must be allowed to grade their teachers and what are its benefits.
First of all, assigning grades through websites will provide genuine feedback on teachers performance. This will give a teacher a fair idea on their weak areas and an opportunity to enhance their skills. For example, when I was in the college our college introduced the grading system and proved beneficial for both teachers as well as students. Generally speaking, if we look at the benefits, the grading system will revolutionize the education sector.
Despite the benefits of the grading system, some people believe that dishonest people will get the unnecessary benefit. These people are unaware of the fact that no manipulation of data can happen. For instance, all the data stored in websites is encrypted. In contrast, after analyzing every possibility, the grading system will provide fair results.
Grading of teachers by students with the help of websites is changing the education sector to a great extent. In my opinion, over the years the websites will become more advanced which can provide more detailed grading analysis and help teachers to upgrade their skills with time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...bsites will provide genuine feedback on teachers performance. This will give a teacher a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...and proved beneficial for both teachers as well as students. Generally speaking, if we loo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6337396065 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7725102547 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3846153846 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.25397266985 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287415932583 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1057208907 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697403524277 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181614589468 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800659769712 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.