The role of a library in keeping books is obsolete. So universities should use digital media. What is your opinion.
Surely there has no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals the importance of digital media in universities. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain the role of library in keeping books is no longer produced about this phenomenon. In my opinion universities should use digital media and I will discuss reasons behind this notion in further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons of this argument. Firstly, digital media give the effective way of learning because which include a different type of knowledge of different criteria. Secondly, with the advancement of technology different types of electronic media are available for enormous purpose so digital media are mandatory in universities and not keeping books in library. Furthermore, digital media is a portable source because which gives the information at any time.
In addition to it, keeping books in library provide the old learning methods which are not enough for the progress of students and less effective. Moreover, digital media gives the wide range of information from a single source which university students can learn more knowledge with the help of it as well as they can do modern type of knowledge.
In conclusion, universities should use digital media instead of using keeping books at library because digital media offer the better opportunities of learning which is beneficial for university students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earning methods which are not enough for the progress of students and less effect...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32067510549 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84811689322 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548523206751 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4001638641 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.636363636 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.25397266985 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382905774308 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138729174169 0.0925447433944 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117842916569 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251685188009 0.151781067708 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101989683578 0.0609392437508 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.