should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the transportation system and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of road accidents is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that road vehicles can be a plus, and I will examine throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, building the transportation system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that constructing roads, as well as heavy vehicles, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of the transportation technology. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and using raods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, building roads might increase the consequences of transportation methods. Moreover, unique aspects of changing the transportation system relate to this reality that the demerits of using vehicles pertain to road materials. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the local government is correlated negatively with cultured people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of reforming the transportation system.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of an advanced transportation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of construction workers prove the significance of planning roads, but also pinpoint the quality of roads implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73846153846 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40753602698 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5226274239 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0739391913715 0.242375264174 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281933903599 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346135826552 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0445539342806 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188754677434 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.