Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people arguing that government construct more roads to facilitate more vehicles. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the latter outdo the former.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that public transport is the only way to reduce traffic on the roads. Not only can improved public transport network reduce traffic jams in the peak hours, but it can also decrease the environmental degradation caused by the increased number of cars. Needless to say, all these merits will stand government in good stead, when it comes to dealing with environment concerns.
Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that, thanks to public transport, it will be more affordable for such people with low income as students and elderly people. Besides, private car user also motivated to use public bus in order to save cost of petrol and car maintenance. Hence, it is apparent that why many are in favour of improving public transport rather than constructing roads.
In view of the arguments one can conclude that the benefits of strengthening public transport infrastructure are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...e latter outdo the former. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97235023041 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75672347272 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603686635945 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5234171457 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248889688908 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819277468285 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631377799779 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131885570362 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350635685533 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.