Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges?
In this contemporary era, there are various learning approaches to accomplish the task and proceed further. Although a few people believe that learning by experience is a better method, others maintain classroom training is good. In my opinion, experimental learning yield more results when compared to traditional coaching and this essay will discuss why practical work is better than the traditional mode of learning.
there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion but the conspicuous one is that by observing through real-time experience not only one can think beyond scope but also grasp and apply the self-learned thoughts at right time. For instance, a school teacher, with his practical experience on the subject, he can create wonders. Apparently, students are motivated to learn with interest and enthusiasm.
On the other hand, the traditional mode of learning brings disinterest and demotivate learners to proceed further. Most of the students sleep due to lack of interest while the teacher is engaged with teaching students as they are not ready to visualize what lecture is trying to convey. For example, a study revealed that students tend to show more interest by asking questions when they were taken to the laboratory when compared to the classroom. Hence it is evident why traditional learning is boring and demotivating.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of practical learning are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than the traditional mode of learning. there are a myriad of reasons in favor o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...n the traditional mode of learning. there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ional mode of learning. there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion but th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...oratory when compared to the classroom. Hence it is evident why traditional learning ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24789915966 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83415430407 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59243697479 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5216558477 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224827609164 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085649216695 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411917442496 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129164861418 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290502720287 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.