Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges?
Recently the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of formal education are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that modern teaching can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, experimental learning can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of sophisticated students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of professional colleges. Thus, beneficial ramifications of well-working education are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, traditional education can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of traditional teaching are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described theoretical learning. Hence, predicted outcomes of inefficient high schools are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of experimental learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of formal education prove the significance of a sophisticated college, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96279069767 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41110076617 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660465116279 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1836886996 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220773729426 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675961791699 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391672377945 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113563283651 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216599816842 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.