Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges?
Experiential learning is a process of learning through experience. However, others postulate that students get benefit through book in the form of traditional learning. One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is that experiential learning is a vital one these days in colleges, and it benefits the students with more intrinsic values. As such, there are more merits because of these learning that can result in good experience among students. I believe that it is wise approach of learning and responsible perspective as described below.
There are countless arguments to support my view, but the most preponderant one is that it plays an integral role in enhancing the cognitive ability of students. Not only helps in gaining knowledge through hands-on experience, but also helps in acquiring wider experience of practical learning, which can lead them towards positive career path to meet their goal. The same are unable to get it via traditional form of learning, which benefits to grab the basic theoretical knowledge. For example, internship, conducted during last year in colleges, provides practical experience where it guides students to reach the top of the mountain, which is impossible through traditional learning. Needless to say, all these benefits stand experiential learning in good stead as far as practical exposure and setting achievable targets concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of these arguments is that experiential learning is of paramount importance nowadays because of competitive market. Besides, these learning to help in promoting of team work and communication skill, which traditional learning cannot be part of. As a result, it makes them become settle in their career path without any hassle. Hence, it is apparent why many people support against this learning process.
To sum up, considering all insights discussed above that relates to beneficial of practical learning process, it emphasizes the significance of analytical and development ability for students than learning through theory.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 313.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58785942492 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97600361141 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562300319489 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9742523536 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249982047699 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953578887928 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744562299184 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164933097445 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692344113656 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.