Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges?
In the recent times, there has much been colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the importance of traditional learning and experimental learning. while few people believe in traditional method, others prefer practical approach. Although it is a matter of discussion, i tend to believe that experimental way of learning will work perfectly well in high school and colleges.
First and foremost, there are a myriad of reasons in favour of my notion and the conspicuous one is that by understanding subject while working on it will not only help students to correlate their theory knowledge but also undergo quite stress less learning; moreover, students in high schools and colleges show interest in their academics so as to build their career. For example, recently it happened my friend to discover new strategy module in science once he started though experimental approach and recognised by chief minister. Apparently, most of the educational systems focus to started implementing to this mode so as to gain much reputation and business.
On the other hand, traditional form of learning not able to do well in most of the colleges and show poor results in terms of learning. recent survey shows most of the students show poor results in traditional approach as they are not able to concentrate. For instance, twenty percent of students failed in their academics in the year 2000 due to the traditional approach model. Hence it is evident why learning while working is better than traditional mode.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the advantages of parallel learning while doing are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...nal learning and experimental learning. while few people believe in traditional metho...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... Although it is a matter of discussion, i tend to believe that experimental way o...
^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...eges. First and foremost, there are a myriad of reasons in favour of my notion and t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...lleges show interest in their academics so as to build their career. For example, recent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...us to started implementing to this mode so as to gain much reputation and business. On...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recent
...show poor results in terms of learning. recent survey shows most of the students show ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... due to the traditional approach model. Hence it is evident why learning while workin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13602941176 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83953033545 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9882724681 50.4703680194 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237345094912 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943936892372 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085801351089 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146744466841 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648734108496 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.