Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work
well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is
the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or
colleges?
Some people believe experimental learning can work well in formal education while others believe traditional form of learning is the best. I entirely believe that experimental learning can work well in high schools or colleges.
From a social point of view, learning something by doing it is indeed bound to gaining experience, which means it might lead to both solving problems and critical thinking. For instance, a group of reputable scientists, working at prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between new methods of learning and engineering occupations as well as using hands. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that creativity is correlated with not only learning theoretically but also practically.
Moreover, in political terms, cramming information is undoubtedly attributable to traditional methods, in that it would lead to memorizing, recalling and forgetting. A well-known example of such an attribution is medical science, which causes concern that it had been mistaken in taking curing people for granted. Had it forgotten experimental learning in advance, it might have had the opportunity to do sth. Thus, sth could play a significant role in sth.
To recapitulate, I entirely believe that experimental learning can work well in high schools or colleges. However, as every garden may have some weeds, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strain legislations and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68995633188 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23390676611 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637554585153 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5888034613 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.454545455 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350416167721 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131886266465 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123017827823 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212209202759 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120861137245 0.0609392437508 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.