Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr

Essay topics:

Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.

In this competitive world, advertisements take a pivotal role to increase the value and attract people toward them. It levy and provide multifarious features within a glance to public. People believe the notion that these advertisements can be place in schools to get extra revenue but other people argue that these distract people from their daily routine and conspicuous bad influence their performance. I reckon the notion believing in ban of these advertisement in schools, will discuss reasons and solutions and give conclusion.
Firstly, there are multifarious bad influences on study and performance of students. Advertisements at school may have vulgar images or replace the good thoughts to bad imaginary though. For example, new release movies posters, garments advertisements poster. Pupils come to school for education not for a ambassador of any external revenue for schools. Any vulgar poster distract school's students and causing them to severe failure in their performance which results them to lagging in their objectives.
Secondly, I believe there are many profound solutions which can be in place to stop these holdings. Places where they can put these attracting advertisements like cinemas, markets and roads can be emphasized. In additions as an alternative, heavy penalties can be implement on sponsors if they break any rules in case of vulgarness. These barrier will clear the harassment to women from societies.
Ultimately, people believing in advertisements held not in school but in other places as aforementioned. I would recommend Government's policies must be stringent and remind everyone by campaign in different regions.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'levies'?
Suggestion: levies
...alue and attract people toward them. It levy and provide multifarious features withi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this advertisement' or 'these advertisements'?
Suggestion: this advertisement; these advertisements
...I reckon the notion believing in ban of these advertisement in schools, will discuss reasons and so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons and solutions and give conclusion. Firstly, there are multifarious bad infl...
^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ls come to school for education not for a ambassador of any external revenue for ...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them to lagging in their objectives. Secondly, I believe there are many profo...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this barrier' or 'These barriers'?
Suggestion: This barrier; These barriers
... break any rules in case of vulgarness. These barrier will clear the harassment to women from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he harassment to women from societies. Ultimately, people believing in advertis...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i reckon, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53149606299 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11681005661 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614173228346 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1522991662 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210950045161 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693993198816 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635761814255 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125602846706 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520452762564 0.0609392437508 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.