Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, The phenomenon of placing advertisements in public schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of raising funds is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that beneficial advertisement can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, an advertisement placed in the schools can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of collecting a substantial amount of additional funding and solving financial problems are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered providing better facilities to the students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of placing advertisements in schools can be seen.
Within the realm of science, advertisements which contribute to treating as a captive audience might increase consequences of child abuse. Moreover, fundamental aspects of exploiting students would relate to this reality that the demerits of additional funding pertain to making nonsense business. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of such corporate sponsors is correlated negatively with misguiding.se ervdaHence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of adverse effect on students.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of placing advertisements in school in order to raise funding to outweigh its demerits. Thus, the positive aspects of advertisements should be considered as it also improves the awareness among the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ements which contribute to treating as a captive audience might increase conseque...
^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egatively with misguiding.se ervdaHence, it is correct to presume preconceived no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78228782288 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35610833975 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1722046702 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.454545455 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195919342308 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072994071 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468411418722 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112441220131 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162317182833 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.