Using of Over-packed food could be bad. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, using of over-packed foods has become an essential trend in the competitive world. Producers are trying to attract more customers by providing luxury packing. While some people are against the idea of using packed food, others hold an opponent’s view and encourage customers to continue consuming. This essay will examine both sides of this argument by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people are supporting using over-packed food. First and foremost, an array of inhabitant argued that using aluminum foil and superior plastic layers could lead to safer and healthier food. Secondly, producers use an essential valid logic that using over packing could prevent harming to products during the transportation. According to an academic research conducted by Dubai International University, using the attractive and colorful package in food industry could lead to profit to that company in this competitive and ever-increasing market. So, the manufacturer’s reason for using over-packing method could be reliable.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that using over-packed products could be harmful to both environmental and social. For instance, an academic research conducted by Melbourne University shows that producer often using a non-disposal wrapper like plastic in their packing which is lead to a harmful effect on the environment and other living beings. Furthermore, these materials cost a lot, and this added fee should be paid by customers which is unnecessary. Lastly, the chemical used for packing might be unhealthy for some part of people.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, using too many over-packed products could be detrimental for all of the human beings and environment, and profoundly believe that government should have set some restricted regulations to avoid future harms to nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...acked products could be detrimental for all of the human beings and environment, and profo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55631399317 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05536436941 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590443686007 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4135108184 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305327701145 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127219708586 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794808916664 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199870291501 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063044266212 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.