Value added by travel in Education. Is travel a necessary component of education or not? Will student sitting at home have more knowledge?
Having educational trips has become a controversial issue among the public. Although it is regarded by a considerable number of inhabitants as thoroughly both constructive and positive, I am inclined to profoundly believe that this journey is beneficial as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
There are several reasons why going on trips while studing is advantageous. First and foremost, this journey is well worth experiencing and has some beneficial effects for pupils. For instance, they can enhance their awareness, information and knowledge by observing new places which are correlated with their majors. According to a recent survey which was conducted by the Tehran University, the historical students who went on trips during their education, had great scores and can demonstrate their assignments or even their thesis perfectly. Furthermore, not only are these journeis amazing and get away pupils from dull classes but also they might gain some job opportunities and if they are able to recognize thses opportunities, they will have a prosperous future.
On the minus side, there is no doubt that these trips have some demerits as well. Namely, they are relatively expensive and the pupils should accept their costs. Moreover, due to these costs, some of them are not able to afford these trips. In addition, if pupils do not have sufficient concentrations during these journies, they will waste of time and money.
In conclusion, while the educational journies might have some demerits, I strongly believe that their benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39516129032 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9452933405 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641129032258 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5123954244 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841927578797 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318562315984 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312453084723 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538561449899 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00923461734304 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.