What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computers, antibiotics and airplane?
The importance of what is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics and airplane. Which was always debatable, has now more controversial. It can be agreed that it has some great impact but it has some drawbacks. This essay will elaborate how computers and how antibiotics and airplane work, thus It will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why but most conspicuous one stems from the fact that In last 100 years which of it is best invention for people. Which conclude the computers, antibiotics and airplane. As an example, studies by Monash university reveal that the computers are used for different activities like playing game, watching movies, news and so on thus, play a vital role in invention also.
However, It has some drawbacks and some people tend to believe that compare to antibiotics and airplane computers are more useful and important for people. As an example, studies reveal that antibiotics are helped for some medical issues and airplane has helped for travelling so, on top of the computers helping for all things like in business, for study, for entertainment and for knowledge also it will help. Hence, is not always worth.
It can be concluded that one would better strike a balance between what is beneficial and what can be harmful. Hence, It Is always advisable to direct one's effort in this right direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...fact that In last 100 years which of it is best invention for people. Which conclude th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...on thus, play a vital role in invention also. However, It has some drawbacks and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9829787234 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71395968729 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548936170213 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2176575193 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5833333333 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274081682701 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106576026418 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158096251104 0.071462118173 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160561855876 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102872637239 0.0609392437508 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.