When you are at the end of your rope, tie a knot, and hold on. How far do you agree with Theodore Roosevelt quote?
Recently, the idea of hard-working has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, “How far Theodore Roosevelt quote is accurate?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that there is no need to strive in every aspect of life, I will briefly discuss the controversial aspects of this issue throughout this essay.
In the realm of the decision-making process, rough time is tied up inextricably with ambitions and decisive manner, which indicates they lead to both risking your neck and achieving goals. As a well-known example, a longitudinal, breakthrough study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between being tenacious and finding solution as well as an exponential increase in strong determination. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of achieving goals is correlated positively not only with a fighting spirit but also being ambitious.
From the personality type standpoints, without the slightest doubt, accomplishment goals attribute to life skills and enormous confidence, in that it would come down to stubborn characteristics and ruthlessness. A salient example of such attribution is the Great Depression, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take frustration for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have the opportunity to pinpoint lack of drive problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of untiring perseverance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that worthy achievements come from not giving up.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...es, 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67803030303 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41418600734 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708333333333 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5023220469 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.272727273 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846172029959 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246230632503 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406082840343 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434058799865 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035196891649 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.