Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the idea of the information revolution has sparked ongoing controversy. While some believe that these changes have been functional so far, the others, on the contrary, argue that consequences are harmful. This essay will briefly discuss why these innovative communications have positively affected communities.
In the realm of technology, communicating have been progressively changed by innovative ideas toward a better future. Surveys conducted by scientists show the more people more their time in the virtual world, the passionate they will be about their society. Take social media; for example, there was a time that people could only communicate whit each other by sending letters. Nowadays, with the arrival of technology, two people can easily talk to each other.
Form the psychological point of view, this way of communication we are currently using will have adverse effects on people’s mood. Because it is not real anymore, and everything depends on a device, not interpersonal relation. These groups omit numerous reports demonstrating links between improvement of human interaction and advanced technology. As a result, they should find other ways to make it easy for people to learn through these media, and prevention will not work anymore.
The advancement of technology has completely changed telecommunication in these last two decade. In my opinion, based on what has been briefly elaborated in this essay, communication has significantly positively changed people’s interaction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, if, so, while, as to, for example, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69736842105 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23155739845 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675438596491 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.2994985634 50.4703680194 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.9230769231 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136344169669 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473110220822 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377702086002 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874334980207 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319741782366 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.