Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of regular education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that references books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the formal education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the facts that merits of learning abilities, as well as based on books education, are inextricable bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered informal learning. Thus, beneficial ramification of both scientific magazines and the role of workshops apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, academic books might increase the consequences of effective education. Moreover, fundamental aspects of educational achievements relate to this reality that the demerits of a scientific experiment pertain to laboratory experiments. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning development is correlated negatively with the distinction between education and practice. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of university education.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of formal learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of academic studies prove the significance of the education system, but also pinpoint excellent books implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7984496124 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30377192914 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631782945736 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0190178079 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224320207393 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673988992728 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544780128722 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124913967094 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280596382913 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.