Social media and the Internet have bad effects on people as they make communications poor. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples.
Recently. the phenomenon of the Internet and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of Facebook and Instagram is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both the constructive and positive by a substantial numbers of individuals. I am inclined to believe that people interactions can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, social medias can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of international relations, as well as computer based communications, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the making friend ability. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of friendships and family relations apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, individuals connections might increase the consequences of being lonely. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of internet development relate to this reality that the demerits of role of talking with each other pertain to leaving comments. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of internet addiction is correlated negatively with the depression. Hence, it is correct that the presumed preconceived notion of international network.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of people’s connection far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the internet prove the significance of making new friend, but also pinpoint the depression implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
Recently. the phenomenon of the Internet and its corr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71317829457 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32825464916 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662790697674 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5561190632 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122046383884 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352338190671 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366650289708 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655407921365 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283229763444 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.