Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life.
Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time at work and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of workplace issues is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a number of substantial individuals. I am inclined that spending time at home can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, having free time can provide the society by some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the merits of being hard worker, and people's lifestyle, are inextricably bound up. According yo my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered wasting the time. Thus, beneficial ramifications of satisfied people and local people apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the leisure time can increase the consequences of the modern life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the rural life could relate to this reality that the demerits of a full-time work pertain to the private life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the lazy people is correlated negatively with the life span. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the labor force.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a full-time job far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the life issue prove the significance of the local people, but also pinpoint wasting time implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26515151515 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02593435092 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643939393939 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7345744492 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320646190316 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10332080356 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820177105162 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16896014687 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448461369192 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.