Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the education system is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that schools policies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, formal education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the role of books, as well as talent students, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered schools' curriculum . Thus, beneficial ramifications of both learning management and study strategies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, scientific books might increase the consequences of books developments. Moreover, fundamental aspects of journals publication could relate to this reality that the demerits of students' issues pertain to books requirements. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of aggressive students is correlated negatively with education problems. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of universities' management.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning systems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the higher education prove the significance of postgraduates' issues, but also pinpoint undergraduates' future implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...an academic experiment which discovered schools curriculum . Thus, beneficial ramificat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ment which discovered schools curriculum . Thus, beneficial ramifications of both ...
^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'book'.
Suggestion: book
... demerits of students issues pertain to books requirements. As a tangible example, so...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84126984127 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34440141975 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670634920635 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3776443922 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187132831655 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547014908707 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401629609098 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094222881642 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292284539529 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.