Whether formal writing examination is a good way to assess students learning?
In this competitive era, examination assessment methodology plays a significant role in education system. There are enormous benefits of written examination for students learning. Many argues that informal examination are good and it will not create any burden on students. In this article, i will depict my thought on formal and informal examination with few examples.
To begin with, writing examination for students learning assessment, There are numerous advantages. Firstly, student will do full time study for written examination so they will become more goal oriented in completing task. Secondly, in written examination students will not be able to copy answers because of the presence of examiner in examination hall.Furthermore With this method students learning assessment will be more reliable and accurate.
On the contrary part, Some prefers that journal writing or other practical exercise is also beneficial for the assessment of students learning. In most of the cases, in journal writing students are not applying their mind, they just do copy paste for timely submission.If they do this by their own without copy then this will become a game changer for students. They need not to allocate time and need not to take stress for examination.
In conclusion, for students learning assessment written examination outweigh the oral and journal writing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ny burden on students. In this article, i will depict my thought on formal and in...
^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...us advantages. Firstly, student will do full time study for written examination so they w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...resence of examiner in examination hall.Furthermore With this method students learning asse...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...resence of examiner in examination hall.Furthermore With this method students learning asse...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ractical exercise is also beneficial for the assessment of students learning. In ...
^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...ust do copy paste for timely submission.If they do this by their own without copy...
^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for timely submission.If they do this by their own without copy then this will be...
^^
Line 9, column 379, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allocate'?
Suggestion: allocate
...ame changer for students. They need not to allocate time and need not to take stress for ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
... need not to allocate time and need not to take stress for examination. In conclus...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54976303318 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95982852418 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 139.433497537 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549763033175 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8576486005 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.454545455 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.33497536946 169% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31427628987 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139701996573 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815152389094 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214061224049 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686288934082 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.