Will computer be able to replace classroom teacher?
In this ever advancing era development can be seen happening cosmically. However, the debatable side of many of these advancements has now become controversial. Likewise, some masses reckon that computer will be able to replace classroom teacher, while others contradict their claim. In my perspective this will not happen because physical presence of the instructor in the classroom is most important. I will portray my views in this regard.
To embark with, there are numerous aspects favoring the proposition, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that a teacher who present in the classroom can easily understand whether the students are learning the topic at the current pace and any alteration in the teaching. Moreover, he can figure out which students require more attention. For instance, my friend Amir was weak in his studies and our science teacher often gave him special attention to keep him on the track. This could not have been possible if the teacher was not present in the classroom.
Probing ahead, it would be justifiable to assert that interactive sessions during teaching are also equally essential, as well as any doubt in the students mind are readily resolved during such sessions because they can ask questions and get answer instantly. For instance, I was not good in mathematics while doing my diploma. Hence, I would note down my all doubts during the class. After the regular class hours, I would approach my professor with my doubts. Those direct interactive sessions with my teacher improved my grades.
To sum up, a computer may be faster than a human being, but it is not more intellectual it cannot replace human instructors in the classroom because of its inherent shortcoming.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09507042254 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77039738419 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630281690141 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5047200942 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295993304806 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910497979487 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131516957655 0.071462118173 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18061930224 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122889639898 0.0609392437508 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.