In view of the reading, the author enumerates lots of benefits which can create by considering taxes for cigarette smokers, such as one exists for unhealthy foods, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made by the article and presents piece of evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that it can provide a dissuade situation which smoker do not use the cigarette again since not only should they pay money for the buying this but also they should pay money for taxes, so they buy less cigarette to manage their money. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the taxes could not have necessarily effect on buying less cigarette and it may be caused buy less-quality one in same quantity. In this situation, it can create a more obnoxious effect on their health.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the income of taxes can spend on cover the medical cost, on both smoker and nonsmoker people. As a matter of fact, it is logical to people who want to have healthier life, pay less medical costs when they get some harmful effect from other people. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that it is a good idea that people pay for the consequence of what they do, but when we consider low-income and high-income, it is not fair since the result of effect is not equal and it can create a much greater burden for smaller income.
Finally, the author asserts the significant effect of these taxes on government's revenue and its effect on different project as the last point for supporting the benefits of taxes. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by elucidating that the specific effect of this taxes on the government's revenue may cause the encoragement of government to do not set a ban for using the cigarette in different places since they really do not want loss of this huge income!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., the author argues that it can provide a dissuade situation which smoker do not use the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...he significant effect of these taxes on governments revenue and its effect on different pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...elucidating that the specific effect of this taxes on the governments revenue may ca...
^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...he specific effect of this taxes on the governments revenue may cause the encoragement of g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, may, really, so, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73668639053 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51599170869 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505917159763 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5057551574 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.1 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 21.698381199 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118161712503 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473748237916 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478036578215 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782113835137 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356076822275 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.