The article and the professor are mainly argued about the migration of the humpback. The article states that the humpback whales successfully move from one place to other with the help star navigation and prove three reasons to support. However, the professor opposes this point by saying the theories are fascinating and not convincing and he refutes each of the author's opinions.
First, the passage states that they are brilliant because of the high degree complexity of their brain compared to other animals. The professor says that the other animals also having the cognitive ability. He mentioned that dogs also use navigation and it is an instinct and there is no scientific connection.
Second, the passage avers that whales migrate in the straight line with their external force. The professor contended this point by saying all animals able to do that. He illustrated that the earth magnetic field support to follow the parallel line. On the top of that, they having a biomagnetic force help to orient them in the magnetic field.
Third, the reading climes that humpback whales exhibit the unusual behavior like straight up their heads called spy-hopping help to look the stars for directions. The professor cast a doubt on this clime he mentioned that although the spy-hopping is rare in animals, the sharks also having the character of sky-hopping. Furthermore, he mentioned that the whales move during the daytime and they could not see any stars so it is purely spectacular.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... any stars so it is purely spectacular.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08979591837 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60686307856 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559183673469 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.379524474 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9230769231 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678397658854 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256255270234 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0116111660578 0.0662205650399 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425590786024 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00708567352689 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.