“Over the past year, our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of l

First of all, it is important to provide information on the residency of the average viewer. No show can give people from a city the news that are happening in another area and expect this to be a successful business plan: people want to hear about what is happening in their area. Therefore, it would be a great piece of information for producers and presentators to get to know their audience better. And, of course, it is perfectly possible that the audience be from more than one area - even states or countries - as there is people in both sides of the border watching the news, say, in El Paso-Juárez or in Portland-Vancouver, where people do not, necessarily, care about the local news of the other place (people in Chihuahua, Mexico, mostly want to go shopping to Texas, USA).

Then, there is the argument that most complaints are concerned with the same issue is, of course, a good reason to worry. But, what about previous complaints? Are viewers (broadly speaking) complaining more or less now than before? This, again, is an important source of information, as it helps to assess the present situation in the light of how it used to be. What if the audience used to complaint much more before, say, because they were being forced to watch the local news of a metropolitan area that were not theirs? On the other hand, are the viewers truly complaining or only suggesting some changes? Perhaps the manager is not understanding the whole point of the audience, just acting out of fear of losing revenue.

Finally, local businesses used to advertise during the late-night program and are, apparently, massively canceling contracts, arguably because of this shift from local to national news. It is never good news to be losing revenue, but what if this is only a shift from local-only to nation wide businesses? Is it not much better to have such clients? So, in order to correctly assess this situation, it would be necessary that the manager presented decision makers with the information on advertising revenues, so that it is clear to everyone who is paying for the content of the program.

For all the reasons mentioned, it is not clear that the conclusion reached by the manager - that more time needs to be devoted to weather and local news - is the correct step for the makers of the late-night show. An assessment of the situation should include data on the audience (where do they live? different area, state or even country?), on the complaints over the time (frequence and volume of the complaints before and now, as well as its content), and, of course, data on the revenues (is total revenue diminishing or only shifting from local to national businesses?). With that in mind, no successful business decision can come without this information.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sting some changes? Perhaps the manager is not understanding the whole point of the audience, just a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: NATION_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nationwide'?
Suggestion: nationwide
...this is only a shift from local-only to nation wide businesses? Is it not much better to ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Different
...ata on the audience where do they live? different area, state or even country?, on the co...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, broadly speaking, of course, as well as, first of all, more or less, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.6327345309 158% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 55.5748502994 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 474.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82911392405 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75737376222 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 204.123752495 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.261793854 57.8364921388 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.473684211 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9473684211 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.70786347227 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24427867383 0.218282227539 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669366416079 0.0743258471296 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630021412322 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15431581838 0.128457276422 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416939264035 0.0628817314937 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/over-past-year-our…

----------------------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 474 350
No. of Characters: 2211 1500
No. of Different Words: 222 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.666 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.665 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.65 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.149 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.472 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5