Why do we need to prevent the extinction of some animals like dinosaurs and dodos if it is caused by natural processes What is your opinion about this

Essay topics:

Why do we need to prevent the extinction of some animals like dinosaurs and dodos if it is caused by natural processes? What is your opinion about this?

There is no doubt that it is our duty to save the rare species of animals (dinosaurs and dodos) for study and research purposes in times ahead. While there are some who believe, it is necessary to control their disappearance from Earth due to environmental effects. I do not completely agree with the view and would support my explanation by giving relevant examples.
On the one hand, researchers have concluded that it is not advisable to prevent the extinction of these animals. This is because, dinosaurs are dangerous predators, which can harm human life at any moment. For example, I believe these creatures are a carrier for many rare diseases, which in turn could lead to epidemics in times to come. As a result, many precautions are undertaken during handling of these species. In contrast, since dinosaurs are wonders of nature, they should be preserved as an example for future generations.
On the other hand, I believe they should be preserved and studied upon by scientists to find out about their struggle for survival. The reason is that, we can know about, many facts related to the prehistoric era by analysis of beasts. For example, a study conducted by the UK news channel - BBC reported about few rare species of non- carnivorous dinosaurs which were not a threat for co-existing animals. However, dinosaurs have a natural aggressive instinct so an unforeseen act could become catastrophic for animal handlers. As a result, they need to be held up in safe confines away from public interactions, in order to prevent any accidents. Nevertheless, I believe every creature should have freedom of existence, so measures should be undertaken to help them survive regardless of their ferocity.
In conclusion, although these unique animal are dangerous for society, personally I believe they are creations of God and should be given a fair chance of existence and not extinction.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-17 nehatshahi 92 view
2019-03-17 nehatshahi 79 view
2019-03-17 nehatshahi 61 view
Essays by user nehatshahi :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0607028754 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89073049102 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591054313099 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7176237558 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138008708009 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448959782412 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313461145753 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764810529863 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321715905112 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.