Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are many types of traits in the humans' personalities that might specify them from each other. Some people believe that some characteristics can improve humans' personalities by practicing and learning. However, other antagonists for this concept point out that humans' traits come naturally. I disagree with this outlook merely to some extent.
First and foremost, what makes people personality different from each other is their instinctive traits and talents of them. Many survey and research supported a fact that leadership trait similar to other humans' traits are born with humans. As a result, some people could be superior leaders in teams and others cannot be good managers or leaders. There are some significant examples in the history of mankind to support this opt. For instance, many historians express that Napelon Bonapart had an incredibly talented character for being a leader. He could easily use this talent to bring phenomenal strategies for conquering the world and winning the battles. Thus, there was not sufficient evidence to represent that these brilliant leaders in history learned these types of strategies or have been taught by well-known teachers.
On the other hand, many scientists believe that they can improve many kinds of traits of humans at young ages. Many experiences in schools represented that teachers who try to improve the leadership skill of children by giving them responsibilities to guide a team and manage their classmates could have significant effects on enhancing the leadership skill of children and increase the desire and passion for being leaders in future. I believe that children at young ages have the capability of learning many things. So, if their teachers try to improve their talent and personality in the right direction, they would be able to enhance this talent to build their future.
In a nutshell, according to all above-mentioned, it is crystal clear that people born with the interest and talent of being superior and incredible leaders. However, by recognizing leadership talent in young ages can provide people the chance to improve their leadership skills to become superior leaders in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun survey seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many surveys'.
Suggestion: Many surveys
...instinctive traits and talents of them. Many survey and research supported a fact that lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 425, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he desire and passion for being leaders in future. I believe that children at young ages ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 306, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rship skills to become superior leaders in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33043478261 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78454039231 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6867210497 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.176470588 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139888116004 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501137685181 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366536835113 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878956446586 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346846220445 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.