The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrate the ways to approach City Hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Overall ,while the modifications brought with them the melioration of the car park, the road to access the hospital was totally expanded with the addition of the bus station. Moreover, the hospital road was transferred with two roundabouts.

Significant changes were seen in 2010. Firstly, the small bus stops were demolished and a single large bus station was constructed towards the west of the hospital road. Secondly, the common car park was converted into an exclusive space for staff to park their vehicles and a new separate public car park was made on the eastern side of the city hospital. Lastly, there were two roundabouts built on either end of the hospital road, one at its intersection with the ring road and the other with the city road; with both of them having an entrance to the bus station.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-02 Rashila 78 view
2020-01-02 Rashila 60 view
2019-12-26 DAMIN 67 view
2019-12-01 vvaibhav51 56 view
2019-11-29 Diksha Bharti 61 view
Essays by user nicktyranov :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ospital in 2007 and in 2010. Overall ,while the modifications brought with the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83766233766 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58999756123 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7020490514 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183893947279 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109955839202 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862109655107 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178411261061 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857015460075 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.