You have recently attended a work-related course. Write a letter to your manager and say
– What course was it, and when did you take it?
– What did you like about it?
– What improvements can be made in the future?
Dear Sir,
I am writing this letter to tell you about my latest work related three-day crash course on Value Added Tax, which was organized by the Federal tax Authority in Dubai and available in two slots from 1st May to 3rd May 2019 and 1st Jun to 3rd Jun 2019. I attended it in May slot.
I liked many points about this course. Firstly, I liked the idea to make business community aware, and not to simply enact the law and levy penalty. Course content and planning, they made, was quite impressive. While they started the presentation, it was mainly about the historical background of VAT and followed with reason for introducing VAT in the country. Gradually, they explained its registration in a quite interesting way followed by that invoicing section. Finally, they ended the lecture with hefty penalties thereto for anyone’s wrongdoings and their tax evasion. Overall, their presentation was well-organized in itself.
On the other hand, there are some areas for improvement which I would like to recommend them. Speakers were not much confident in reverse charge mechanism topic, probably, due to lack of exposure they got. The suggestion, in future, government may pick up some presenters from diversified to who can explain this topic very well with some practice examples and not simply being staff of Big 4. In addition, government should introduce few more slots.
With this, I would like to wrap up with a note of thanks to nominate on company behalf and helping me to sharpen my skill set with this course.
Yours sincerely
Tom Edward
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...Jun 2019. I attended it in May slot. I liked many points about this course. Fi...
^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...k of exposure they got. The suggestion, in future, government may pick up some presenters...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, well, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 32.9175257732 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 937.175257732 140% => OK
No of words: 263.0 206.0 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98098859316 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70208209882 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 127.690721649 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.622605031667 104% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 290.88556701 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.13402061856 120% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7733135089 44.8134815571 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 76.5299724578 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 16.8248392259 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 4.34317383033 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137345868873 0.216113520407 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416057197237 0.0766984524023 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357747606387 0.0603063233224 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069290059054 0.12726935374 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381871437372 0.0580467560999 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 8.37731958763 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 41.2886597938 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.4606741573 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.25 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.