TPO 41

Essay topics:

TPO 41

The lecture and the reading discuss using glass for building materials and it causes several harmed for birds that attach to the glass. Although the passage claims that several solutions are available for people to use them for preventing injuries to birds, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.

First and foremost, the passage points out that people would better use one-way glass instead of regular glass. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that one-way glass show only outside; hence, they work as a mirror and reflect all the picture of outsides like the sky and trees. The birds cannot recognize that this picture is reflected in the sky or trees. Therefore, they try to neer these pictures and they attach to the glass.

Furthermore, unlike the passage which state that people would use some paint colourful lines on the windows to prevent injuries birds. However, the professor argues that people can not see outside perfectly. Also, these lines prevent the sunlight comes to the building so that the building becomes dark. She adds that the birds see these lines like a small hole; therefore, they try to fly true this hole, and they attach to the glass.

Finally, although the reading passage says that making some magnetic field around the building for guiding birds, and it prevents harm to birds. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that it is true that birds can use the magnetic of the Earth for finding direction; but, they use this ability only for long-distance. For example, when they want to migrate from a cooler place to a warmer place, they use this ability. Because they must travel between countries. However, in the cities, for travelling a short distance, they use eyes and sunlight for finding direction. As a result, it is not an influential solution.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a warmer place, they use this ability. Because they must travel between countries. How...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03536977492 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36824960619 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508038585209 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7489555365 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134656594687 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502792715684 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323236024913 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867348105793 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353593362294 0.0443174109184 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.