If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Corporate hiring completely depends on the job demands. Some jobs may need the employer to hire an inexperienced fresher to bring in updated ideas and practices to the business; however, other job vacancies require work experience. Both type of workers have their merits and demerits. Considering the benefits, I would prefer to hire experienced staff at higher salary for the following reasons.
First, people with job experience have academic as well as practical knowledge which is necessary to deal with wide array of adverse situations coming up in the business. Their experience can guide the co-workers to handle the issues more efficiently, reducing the risk of hurting the business. For instance, the hospital where I worked as a physician assistant in the intensive cardiac health unit, the patient care team was lead by a renowned intensivist who had 8 years of experience in Critical care. We often used to come across different complications in variety of patients which demanded right intervention at the right time. Such situations were tackled by him. During the course of my tenure, i witnessed the kind of miracles which people often talk about, saving lives from fatal cardiac conditions and significantly reducing the mortality and morbidity rate. Consequently, more patients were attracted to our hospital for treatment purpose. Without his years of knowledge and experience, it was not possible for the cardiac centre to run such efficiently.
Moreover, while a fresher has more of new ideas and approaches to bring profit to the organisation, yet, they are likely to be unaware of the company’s practices in the business world. This can result in lose to the company instead of bringing more economic benefit. For example, last summer, my uncle hired a young inexperienced chef in his restaurant. In order to make profit he started to buy the cheap meat which was treated with chemicals and antibiotics. When the customers learned about this, they stopped visiting and as a result, the business was hurt. The shows how the hiring a fresher could actually bring loss to the company, instead of profit.
In conclusion, the advantages of hiring an experienced personnel are significantly more than that of the low salary inexperienced worker's. This is because the past work experience of an employee can not only cut the odds of hurting the business but also bring in more financial benefit to the organisation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'During'.
Suggestion: During
...e. Such situations were tackled by him. During the course of my tenure, i witnessed the kind of mira...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...by him. During the course of my tenure, i witnessed the kind of miracles which pe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21518987342 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92593396525 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587341772152 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2464211898 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179806513829 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506908690543 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608501083723 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120593804741 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764257859499 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.