T p o 42
The reading passage mentions to three solutions which have presented to hinder the birds to distinguish inaccurately the building's glass with sky that cause some injuries and difficulties for them. However, the professor repudiates three mentioned methods as solutions for savage birds' problem due to some points.
According to the passage, One-Way Glass which known as first solution, mentions to utilities the kind of glass that is obvious in only one way. In fact, in these ilk of glasses, it makes feasible to see out for inside of building but it is ambiguous for birds. The professor rejects this solution due to its negative effect for birds. In the other words, mentioned glasses just reflects the lights and the sky or other natural things' images can mislead the birds. As a result, the presented first solution will fail to attain the demanded outcomes.
Secondly, the professor explains his argument about second method which mentions the colorful design glasses base on some points. In his opinion, this type of glasses that are using lines and designs to modify The birds direction cannot be sufficient due to their trifle dimensions. Furthermore, these glasses reduce the amount of inside's light. So, mentioned method's negative effect cannot be present as a logical solution.
Thirdly, the professor casts doubt about third way which mentioned in the reading and refers to magnetic field. Because, according to birds behaviors, they use the earth magnetic field just for long travel beside that the light and their eyes play significant role to find direction. Consequently, the reading mentioned third points or magnetic field to change the birds direction cannot produce favorable results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage mentions to three so...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ntioned methods as solutions for savage birds problem due to some points. Acc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge birds problem due to some points. According to the passage, One-Way Glass ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this ilk' or 'these ilks'?
Suggestion: this ilk; these ilks
...is obvious in only one way. In fact, in these ilk of glasses, it makes feasible to see ou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fail to attain the demanded outcomes. Secondly, the professor explains his arg...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e using lines and designs to modify The birds direction cannot be sufficient due to t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot be present as a logical solution. Thirdly, the professor casts doubt about...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bird'.
Suggestion: bird
...o magnetic field. Because, according to birds behaviors, they use the earth magnetic ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
... points or magnetic field to change the birds direction cannot produce favorable resu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction cannot produce favorable results.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in fact, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28205128205 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54737084135 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.914200022 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353723358551 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118937363389 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562924406599 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211562543303 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242317342788 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.