We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

It has been debatable issue whether individual learn from people they have a same type of interest or one should able to learn from all type of masses regardless of their interest and stream. I firmly believe that people should learn more from individuals they have a same views. However, in some scenario people get a chance to correlate situations without comparing background of each other. Here, I will describe my point of view with some of the examples that would represent my perception.

First and foremost, if any one has a same interest then it is easy to understand the problems of that particular people. Apart from this, one should able to give advice properly because of the same area of field. For example, in high school when students get difficulty in subjects, they mostly visit their subject teacher. Since pedagogy have a good experience in that particular matter, teachers easily understand the issue of the subjects means how particular theory works. Hence, it is preferable to every pupil should go for subject teacher because they have same interest and able to provide efficient solution rather than consult other seniors and peers.

Secondly, same interest always able to give advice from past experience. Therefore, again no any person will face same situation. Apart from this, same mindset also able to produce propitious result. Here, I would like represent the example of space agency called NASA, NASA works for space exploration and it is one of the most successful space organization in the world. However, organization did a mistake in their past, they always gives the suggestion to other space agency. Owing to they know the consequences of it and they provide a help to the other space agency as well. Here, objective of every space firm mostly same. That's why they share common thoughts and it is beneficial for auspicious future of the space science.

Admittedly, in some occasion people get a chance learn from other things without correlation of the work. For example, in gym instructor provides the motivation for weight loss; it is a tedious process, that's why everyone should do arduous work in order to achieve goal. However, students correlate this motivation in exams as well. Likewise, GRE verbal is tough part of the exam; but, with proper strategy every student will reach their intended score if they do the regular work daily. Hence, it is obvious that people correlate their view to the other scenarios as well; but, they have to understand the hidden intention of it.

To conclude, I re-affirm that it is obvious that same situation help a lot to understand views and work. However, it is individual ability that how it is correlate with them. But, it is also more plausible that one should understand hidden motivation and goal and apply same strategy in their field regardless of the background of their situation.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
..., I will describe my point of view with some of the examples that would represent my percep...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...perception. First and foremost, if any one has a same interest then it is easy to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'subjects'' or 'subject's'?
Suggestion: subjects'; subject's
...hers easily understand the issue of the subjects means how particular theory works. Henc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 57, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...nterest always able to give advice from past experience. Therefore, again no any person will fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 91, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... from past experience. Therefore, again no any person will face same situation. Ap...
^^
Line 11, column 437, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...id a mistake in their past, they always gives the suggestion to other space agency. O...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 631, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ective of every space firm mostly same. Thats why they share common thoughts and it i...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 204, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...r weight loss; it is a tedious process, thats why everyone should do arduous work in ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01871101871 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56610174728 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465696465696 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.154849046 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.56 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.24 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112091775383 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364685930063 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376623959907 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072947563265 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472186447868 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.