The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart delineates the consumption of the food in China during the time period of 1985 to 2010. There are mainly three food represent in the graph which is Meat, Salt and Fish. The food consumption represents in person per grams in every week.
First of all the careful scrutiny of the graph reveals that the in 1985 almost 600 grams of fish was eaten by per person. Same as Meat consumption was about 100 grams and Salt consumption was below the 500 grams. In the next 35 years period meat consumption was gradually increased to about 100 grams, whereas salt consumption was plunged down to about 300 grams.
Furthermore, The Chinese people fish consumption was not steady, at every 5 years there is a subtle variance. Albeit after 1995 Chinese people fish consumption was constant augmented and reach almost 850 grams in 2010. In 2010 Chinese people salt consumption was identical to the meat consumption.
Overall, The time period between 1985 to 2010 Chinese people was more dispositioned towards the meat and less attracted about the salt. While the fish consumption fluctuated for the first 10 years after that it was increased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...identical to the meat consumption. Overall, The time period between 1985 to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, whereas, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95360824742 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58442834066 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3174596324 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3636363636 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206980614448 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105130392337 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449344647119 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150636233201 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438884656391 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.