The line graph illustrate the amount of carbon dioxide exhaled by each person in UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, large amounts of carbon dioxide was emitted in the UK, whilst the least was exhaled in Portugal. Similarly, Italy and Portugal had a steady increase for carbon dioxide emission rate throughout the period, as Sweden and UK experinced a decrease of carbon dioxide emitted by each person.
It is noticeable, high amount of carbon dioxide about 11metric tonnes was exhaled in the UK from 1967 to 1977, and began to decline gradually to around 9 metric tonnes in 2007. Portugal had the least average carbon dioxide emitted, at almost 1metric tonne in 1967 and increased steadily to around 5.7 metric tonnes in 2007. Generally, UK remained the nation with highest amount of carbon dioxide emitted throughout the period, whilst Portugal remained the least.
Furthermore, Sweden had an average carbon dioxide exhaled of approximately 8.2metric tonnes in 1967 and fluctuated sharply to almost 10.1metric tonnes in 1977, as a drastic fall to around 7metric tonnes was seen in 1987, it was superceded by further decline equated to Portugal of about 5.7metric tonnes in 2007. Whereas, Italy experienced a rapid increase from 4.1metric in 1967, followed by a slow rise of about 7metric tonnes above Sweden in 1987, as it remained constant, thereafter upto 2007, at around 7.8metric tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...2007. Generally, UK remained the nation with highest amount of carbon dioxide emitted throu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on with highest amount of carbon dioxide emitted throughout the period, whilst P...
^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e emitted throughout the period, whilst Portugal remained the least. Furtherm...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17748917749 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57305325677 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458874458874 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5071018559 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216857821317 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128103225744 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725865272519 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177844741855 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604260824878 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.