Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some individuals are of the opinion that issues related to traffic and means of commuting can be tackled through relocation of residents from the countryside to towns. In this essay, I will clarify why I disagree with this trend.
Moving to cities can have detrimental effects with regards to traffic. This is because the more the people reside in cities, the greater the liability for traffic jams will be. For instance, a research, which was conducted by a team of statisticians in Berlin in 2006, revealed that the prevalence of traffic congestions almost doubled following the migration of refugees from the suburbs, and their resettlement in Berlin. Therefore, when cities become more condensed with people, traffic tends to be more problematic. In brief, the trend of relocation of citizens from the countryside to towns can be disastrous in terms of traffic escalation.
In addition, if more people are motivated to live in cities, transportation problems will mount up; owing to the fact that more vacancies, in public transport, will be required to accommodate the newcomers. Consequently, the number of waiting queues will rise and means of transport will become more crowded, hence rendering problems of commuting more intensified. For this reason, encouraging people to reside in cities is vastly disadvantageous for traffic in general and public transport in particular.
To conclude, although some people agree that relocation of residents to cities is an appropriate way to resolve traffic problems, I would argue that transportation issues cannot be mitigated completely by this solution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in brief, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41897233202 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.066505974 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533596837945 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5962512552 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24545270259 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987299127139 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546085536931 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15520190287 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365123452621 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.