High school teachers spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas.
Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for students’ learning and why?
There are several types of style of lectures for professors who teach high school students. While some high school teachers use the method that their students are required to take notes and listen to class materials at most of the class time, some take their class time on communicating between their students and doing the projects by their students. It is so controvertible for teachers to decide specific one solution to improve the effectiveness of students’ learning. In my view, they should select to provide opportunities for their students to trade comments about materials of lectures. They are capable of earning profound knowledge, focusing on classes, and being ready for their future carriers.
To begin with, high school students boost their knowledge of classes’ topic by exchanging their opinions about lectures with their classmates. In ordinary schools, they have to take their time to take notes and hear what their teachers speak about topics. It is so limited for them to talk with their ideas about the classes with each other. Therefore, they cannot know other opinions if their classmates have different viewpoint compared with others. However, their wisdom about lectures is improved by the classes which acquire them to make conversations with others. As a result, they gain deep learning by exchange ideas with their classmates.
Secondly, the lectures where high school professors create communications between their students increase the concentration of students’ attitude against classes. Some high school students often do not concentrate on their lectures because their feelings filled in boring toward their classes. They also complex that it is not intriguing about lecturers, poor PowerPoints, and notetakings. On the other hand, once professors change their lectures from just attendance to more activities, students can be interested in their classes. Hence, high schools should convert their classes to exchanges about the ides between their student.
Finally, high school students prepare their future carries from discussions with others in their classes. For example, in typical lectures which are provided by universities, students have to communicate with their classmates for their assessments such as group presentations, attendance, and essays. These assessments also connect with their future job hunting. Thus, it is so beneficial for them to produce preparations for their future carriers.
To sum up, high schools should produce their classes more communicative between their students. I surely believe that they can turn their knowledge about classes to more deep, improve their motivate against their classes, and are ready for their future carriers
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir knowledge about classes to more deep, improve their motivate against their cla...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58212560386 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7560725186 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480676328502 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1754301495 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.045454545 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390025707442 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142641026158 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116809979991 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255374800514 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087705364527 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.