When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person rather than e-mails, they will produce better work for the project. Do u agree or disagree with this statement? Use examples and reasons to state ur opinion.
The modern world is enveloped with tremendous digital noise with billions of tests, e-mails, and social platforms for communication. Due to the advent of technologies, it is possible to work on projects through e-mails rather than in person. Some people believe that when communicate through personal means, people can work better for projects instead of contacting them through electronic mails. As far as I'm concerned, face to face communication is better because of 3 main rationales, which I can elaborate from hereunder.
To begin with, when talking face to face, people can express their views very effectively, and also can derive the opinions and perspectives of another through the interpretation of body language and gestures, which is not possible through electronic means. For instance, during our final year, we got a project to finish just before our exam. Since we were divided into groups of 5 and no time to meet, we decided to exchange ideas through e-mails. But we could not perform well for this project. However, when we sat down to discuss what went wrong in the project, some colleagues open up that they were not convinced with the ideas of others and they hesitated to tell each other. Had we discussed the ideas in person, we would have opportunities to understand other's viewpoints through their facial expressions and body language and we can make the project a great success. This clearly illustrates the importance of personal communication while working with projects.
Second, personal communication can pour immense plans and diverse ideas about the project simultaneously from different people so that these ideas can right away be analyzed and criticized. Sometimes when we express the plans through emails, we may be distracted because we are in the midst of various other plans. Therefore, if we discuss it face to face the ideas can be discussed and added to the project, which will be beneficial to the project. As per the above example, we re-wrote the project by discussing it together in person, we can add a lot of information, and that in turn improve our grades and can satisfy our professor.
Finally, emotions are not clearly expressed through e-mails. Nowadays, emoji's are available to express our emotions in small pictures or faces, but that is not satisfactory while we work with a group. On top of that, No one likes criticisms when we express our views, while in a group some people may support or refute them. Conflicts can be reduced to much extend if we talk in confidence and eye contact with others.
On the other hand, communication through emails has gots its own advantages. It is much convenient, not go to see at a particular time, and can reply at whatever time we are available. In addition, we can collect data through the access of the internet in the privacy of our own room. However, not all information is available through this.
All in all, by taking all the points into account, I vehemently assure that communication in person is a better choice to work on group projects in contrast to e-mails. It not only does express views effectively through body language and emotions but also provides drastic inputs through group discussions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...hem through electronic mails. As far as Im concerned, face to face communication i...
^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le we work with a group. On top of that, No one likes criticisms when we express ...
^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...r refute them. Conflicts can be reduced to much extend if we talk in confidence an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2687.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 536.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01305970149 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81543079519 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501865671642 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.745609033 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.48 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.44 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.12 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198367117193 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698082064117 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064795028641 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113077948207 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739070494788 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.