Nowadays, the environmental issue, is one of the most significant and controversial issues that many of people concern about it. Major environmental issues may include climate change, pollution and resource depletion. Some people think that the environmental issue is not too complex and therefore it could be handled by individuals, however many of people believe that, that is too complex and complicated to be handle by individuals and in fact it should be handled by government and I am among the second group. I feel this way because of some reasons which I will explain in the following assay:
First of all, as the world is developing with such a fast pace, that the environment is affected considerably negatively. Because of the population growth around the world and consequently the increment of their demands, the factories, which are one of the most important causes of the many pollutions such as air and water pollution, have to produce the products with a fast speed, and in fact, people as an individuals have not such a powerful authority to do something against that, however, I think it should be handled by government. In fact the government could organize and handle the factories by establishing restrict rules and instruction to prevent them doing harmful process which could damage the environment. They could regularly supervise the construction sites of factories to check them that they are obeying the determined laws or not and they have this authority to penalize them if they do something against the laws.
Furthermore, I am of the opinion that, trying to preserve our environment is too complex that needs to be checked scientifically in equipped laboratories. Therefore, the government should allocate enough budget for scientific teams to work on the problems to find out appropriate solutions. Otherwise, individuals could not afford to do such investigations. For example, water pollution is one of those issues that should be considered significantly and that could be solved and handled when the governments support the scientists financially.
To draw my conclusion, according to the above reasons, I think individuals could not handle the environmental issues because they do not have enough authority and power, further than these issues needs considerable amount of money that only governments could afford. Admittedly, I have to mention, each of us, as an individual, have some duties to conserve our environment on a small scale than the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...th a fast speed, and in fact, people as an individuals have not such a powerful authority to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duals have not such a powerful authority to do something against that, however, I...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to do such investigations. For example, water pollution is one of those issues t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2775 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10941212289 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.1621156617 48.9658058833 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.384615385 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7692307692 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 5.45110844103 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290434093598 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101641809151 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833688056547 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183445661735 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808350947382 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.