"The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."
Youths are regarded as the pillar of the governments or for a society. It is important for the youths to be in a direction which will allow them to bring the positive attitude to the development of a society. The prompt also supports the idea about the young people for building the leadership qualities among them. I mostly agree with the authors assertion for two main reasons. However, I do concede that cooperation only will not plays a huge role as there should be a distinctive type of competition among the youths.
First of all, development of any nations depends upon the actions that are taken by the youths of that country. There must be a different kind of programs that is directly related to the youth of the country. Various programs like personal development, moral lessons, cooperation etc. must be introduced within the youths, which will help them to be in a direction. For example, let us take an example of China, where young people are too much involved in the development of their country. They are the building foundation of their nation. Each and every kind of programs, the government is insisting their youth citizen to take part. The innovations and progress of the China is sky-rocketing and this is all due to the major steps that are taken by the governments and the attitude shown towards their young people.
Secondly, the nation main identity is their responsibilities and duties towards the building pillars of the country. How the country is responding to the progress of their nations, is solely depending upon the attitude of that country toward the young people. A developing nation like India, is showing more attentions towards the development of their nations and strengthening their foundation by introducing various innovative programs like "Make in India" program. Nation requires its young people to take part in those programs where each and every invention is solely related to their own products. This is how a country should insist their youths to be in a cooperative program.
Nevertheless, cooperation alone would not bring out the favor for the development of a country. There must be a sense of competition towards the building of a nation and development of a society. For example, if there is a competition towards the major invention of a country then, it might be the case that the best out of the innovations would give the innovations within the particular field. Due to which the country would use the best invention to showcase their talent within the national or international program.
So, in conclusion, a nation must be more focused towards the building of their young people in the society by introducing more programs that are related with the progress and development of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ies among them. I mostly agree with the authors assertion for two main reasons. However...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'play'?
Suggestion: play
... concede that cooperation only will not plays a huge role as there should be a distin...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'play'
Suggestion: play
... concede that cooperation only will not plays a huge role as there should be a distin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nding to the progress of their nations, is solely depending upon the attitude of that country towar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99134199134 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86249662378 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.398268398268 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7785983852 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.260869565 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190611792158 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644981296025 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570393595454 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12352175708 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718129176592 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.