Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people argue that an assiduous person always climbs to the suffice of success and can also lead his co-workers single handedly to triumph by providing inspiration and motivation. I, however, diagree with such view for two reasons and explore it in the following way.
First of all, a group of individual is more likely to achieve a desired outcome than a single isolted person because various members have widw range of views and can look a same subject from antithetical perspectives. If there is a team having a common objectives, then problem diagnosis and solving will also be much easier. For example, In an application developing company apps, games are always programmed by a group of people not a single person. Further, after development of programs they provide it to some other people outside their company to aquire feedback from different criteria. In contrast, if Elon Musk had single handedly became stubborn to develop space capsule, his company would not have achieved the result as it has at present. So, a group with common goal is more in-line to succeed.
Secondly, for big companies, share market institutes can have a great deal of progress after having a contingent of individuals who are actually dedicated. Since such industries must have to keep an eye on various areas; a single person can never gather all the information required. For instance, a football club can be on the top not by buying or solely reliance on a single player. There must be a group effort of the managerial committe to provide with the best training facilities and develop a team with all player helping each other not having proclivity to develop individual record. A recent example is the resignation of president and board of directors of the football club Barcelona who have been blamed of club bad displays besides they does not appear in field to play games. This clearly illustrates that a group is responsible and more inclined to achieve victory rather than a consummate individual.
Thus, in conclusion, it can be clearly said that it is helpful and easy when working as a tem to achieve objectives. This can be done by using diverse knowledge as well as focussing on different aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...at an assiduous person always climbs to the suffice of success and can also lead his co-wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...suffice of success and can also lead his co-workers single handedly to triumph by...
^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'objective'?
Suggestion: objective
...ves. If there is a team having a common objectives, then problem diagnosis and solving wil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 751, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...lamed of club bad displays besides they does not appear in field to play games. This...
^^^^
Line 5, column 893, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...inclined to achieve victory rather than a consummate individual. Thus, in conclusion, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94892473118 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73095392107 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0039928784 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0625 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107076609957 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369191648461 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314227318592 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657891974937 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152137972121 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.